The Dynamics of Social Protection Gaps in Indonesia’s Transforming Labor Market: Gig Workers and Formal Employees
Abstract
Indonesia’s expanding gig economy has reshaped the labor market, offering flexibility while deepening social protection disparities. This study examines the gap in social protection coverage between formal employees and gig workers—online and local—within Indonesia’s employment landscape. Using microdata from August 2018, 2021, and 2023 National Labor Force Surveys (Sakernas), the analysis focuses on the service sector, where gig work is concentrated. A binary logistic regression with marginal effects was used to estimate the probability of workers’ participation in Indonesia’s social security programs. Findings revealed persistent, significant disparities: Online gig workers were 33% less likely and local gig workers 23% less likely to be covered than formal employees. These inequalities widened during and after the COVID-19 pandemic, especially in health and occupational accident insurance. Further analysis showed that disparities were more pronounced among male and urban workers. These results underscore structural vulnerabilities in Indonesia’s dual labor system and highlight the need for inclusive, adaptive social protection reforms. Recommendations include integrating gig workers into national social security schemes through shared contributions, strengthening digital and social protection literacy, and establishing a legal framework that recognizes platform-based employment as part of Indonesia’s labor market.
Full text article
References
Adisty, M., Mundandar, J., & Sumertajaya, I. (2023). Factors influencing informal workers’ registration for social security: A comparative analysis between Indonesia and Taiwan. Jurnal Aplikasi Bisnis Dan Manajemen, 9(2), 523-535. https://doi.org/10.17358/jabm.9.2.523
Agusalim, L., Siregar, H., Anggraeni, L., & Mulatsih, S. (2025). Unveiling the profile of low-wage workers in Indonesia. Jurnal Ketenagakerjaan, 20(1), 108-127. https://journals.kemnaker.go.id/index.php/naker/article/view/471
Alturkey, Y. A. (2024). The gig economy: Insights into worker experiences in the UK and Saudi Arabia. Open Journal of Business and Management, 12(03), 1766-1799. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojbm.2024.123094
Anan, K. (2024). The evolution of employment law in the gig economy. Journal of Modern Law and Policy, 4(2), 29-41. https://doi.org/10.47941/jmlp.2160
Auguste, D., Roll, S., & Despard, M. (2023). Democratizing the economy or introducing economic risk? gig work during the covid-19 pandemic. Work and Occupations, 51(4), 550-606. https://doi.org/10.1177/07308884231202032
Baldry, K., Koekemoer, E., & Olckers, C. (2024). Empirical research on decent work and precarious work for semi-skilled and unskilled blue-collar workers: A scoping review. Australian Journal of Career Development, 33(3), 268-285. https://doi.org/10.1177/10384162241286439
Becker, E. D., Seo, H., Pulignano, V., & Schoukens, P. (2024). Mapping social protection coverage for platform workers: A comparative analysis of Belgium, Italy and the Netherlands. European Journal of Social Security, 26(1), 3-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/13882627241236489
Dluhopolska, T., & Khita, M. (2022). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the international labor market. Herald of Economics, 1(1), 54-70. https://doi.org/10.35774/visnyk2022.01.054
Dungdung, A., & Sharma, A. (2024). Changing trends and challenges of employment and social security for gig workers' rights in India. In Sociolegal Challenges for the Social Justice Continuum, (pp. 40-51). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003561217
Gao, Y., Yu, W., Yu, X., & Huang, Y. (2025). Medical insurance integration improves migrant workers’ employment quality: evidence from China’s URRMI reform. Frontiers in Public Health, 13, 1660023. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1660023
Ghorpade, Y., Rahman, A. A., & Jasmin, A. F. (2024). Social insurance for gig workers: Insights from a discrete choice experiment in Malaysia. International Social Security Review, 77(3), 3-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/issr.12365
Hidayat, Y., & Herman. (2024). Reconstruction of the social security system policy in national development of Indonesia. Journal of Social Transformation and Regional Development, 6(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.30880/jstard.2024.06.01.001
Hu, K. & Fu, F. (2021). Evolutionary dynamics of gig economy labor strategies under technology, policy and market influence. Games, 12(2), 49. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2103.13234
Indra, I. & Nawangsari, S. A. (2025). Legal protection for gig economy workers from the perspective of labor law in Indonesia. Hakim: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Sosial, 3(1), 937-954. https://doi.org/10.51903/hakim.v3i1.2289
Kaufmann, P. G., Havens, D. S., Mensinger, J. L., Bradley, P. K., Brom, H. M., Copel, L. C., ... & CHAMPS Study Investigators. (2021). The COVID-19 study of healthcare and support personnel (CHAMPS): Protocol for a longitudinal observational study. JMIR Research Protocols, 10(10), e30757. https://doi.org/10.2196/30757
Khan, T., MacEachen, E., Premji, S., & Neiterman, E. (2023). Self-employment, illness, and the social security system: A qualitative study of the experiences of solo self-employed workers in Ontario, Canada. BMC Public Health, 23, 643. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15471-8
Kim, J. H. (2019). Multicollinearity and misleading statistical results. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, 72(6), 558-569. https://doi.org/10.4097/kja.19087
Lee, J. & Ruggiero, E. (2022). How does informal employment affect health and health equity? Emerging gaps in research from a scoping review and modified e-delphi survey. International Journal for Equity in Health, 21(1), 87. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-022-01684-7
Luthfi, N. and Hanri, M. (2023). The effect of local government’s elderly social assistance on health spending of poor elderly in Indonesia. Jurnal Perencanaan Pembangunan the Indonesian Journal of Development Planning, 7(2), 299-312. https://doi.org/10.36574/jpp.v7i2.403
Authors

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.