Decoding Hegemony in Digital Marketing Jobs: A Semantic Network Analysis of Jobstreet Indonesia
Abstract
The rapid growth of Indonesia’s digital workforce has been accompanied by increasingly symbolic dynamics in the labor market, especially in how language shapes perceptions of job value. This study analyzes how employers use language in job advertisements to construct symbolic hierarchies and maintain dominance, particularly in the digital marketing sector. Using a descriptive quantitative approach and semantic network analysis, 987 job listings containing the keyword “digital marketing” were collected from Jobstreet over a one-month period and analyzed through bipartite (job title–requirement) and monopartite (job title–job title) networks. The results show that English-dominant job vacancies are closely associated with senior-labeled positions and higher salary offers, while Indonesian appears more frequently in operational roles with lower pay. However, symbolic elevation through titles such as “Manager” or “Specialist” often fails to correspond with actual compensation, and positions requiring many skills are frequently framed with low-status labels such as “Intern” or “Remote,” indicating the use of language to normalize job status while obscuring workload imbalances. Salary information is also often undisclosed, limiting bargaining power and weakening transparency. Additional descriptive findings indicate a geographical concentration of high-value jobs in Jakarta, where English proficiency is more frequently required and median wages are notably higher. Overall, this study demonstrates how recruitment language operates as a form of linguistic hegemony—normalizing inequality by framing structurally similar jobs as symbolically distinct—and highlights the need for stronger regulation and public awareness regarding fair compensation and transparent hiring practices in Indonesia’s digital labor market.
Full text article
References
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2025). Keadaan Ketenagakerjaan Indonesia Februari 2025. Berita Resmi Statistik.
Bates, T. R. (1975). Gramsci and the Theory of Hegemony. Journal of the History of Ideas, 36(2), 351-366.
Chaffey, D., & Ellis-Chadwick, F. (2022). Digital Marketing (8th ed.). Pearson Education.
Creswell, J. W. (2024). RESEARCH DESIGN Pendekatan Metode Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Campuran (Fourth Edition ed.). (A. Fawaid, & R. K. Pancasari, Trans.) Pustaka Pelajar.
Eriyanto. (2021). Analisis Jaringan Media Sosial: Dasar-dasar dan Aplikasi Metode Jaringan Sosial untuk Membedah Percakapan di Media Sosial. Kencana.
Gayatri, G., Jaya, I. G., & Rumata, V. M. (2023). The Indonesian Digital Workforce Gaps in 2021–2025. Sustainability, 15(1), 754.
Hisa, A., Naqshbandi, M. M., & Mohiddin, F. (2025). Meeting the Skills Demands of Employers in Brunei Darussalam: Where Do the Youth Stand? In Brunei Darussalam’s Economic Transition in a Shifting Global Asia (pp. 183-197). Springer Nature Singapore.
International Labour Organization. (2023). Global skills gaps measurement and monitoring: Towards a collaborative framework. International Labour Organization. https://www.ilo.org/publications/global-skills-gaps-measurement-and-monitoring-towards-collaborative-0
Indeed Editorial Team. (2025, Maret 28). Career Guide. Retrieved from Indeed: https://ca.indeed.com/career-advice/career-development/experience-levels
International Monetary Fund. (2024). World economic outlook (International Monetary Fund). International Monetary Fund. Retrieved from https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/Issues/2024/04/16/world-economic-outlook-april-2024
Kaushik, V., & Walsh, C. A. (2019). Pragmatism as a Research Paradigm and Its Implications for Social Work Research. Social Sciences, 8(9), 255.
??cka-Badura, J. (2017). Power relations between employers and potential employees reflected in the grammar of job advertising discourse. Socjolingwistyka, 31, 39-50.
Malik, A., Shah, H. H., & Malik, A. (2025). Power and Hegemony in the Language of Employment Agreements of Selected Institutions: A Transitivity Analysis. ACADEMIA International Journal for Social Sciences, 4(2), 419-428.
Phillipson, R. (2018). Linguistic Imperialism. In C. A. Chapelle, The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0718.pub2
Populix & KitaLulus. (2024). Bridging the Gap: Understanding Job Mismatch in Today's Workforce. Retrieved from https://info.populix.co/reports/bridging-the-gap-understanding-job-mismatch-in-todays-workforce
Populix. (2023). Unveiling the Tech Revolution: How Technology Reshapes the Future of Work. Retrieved from https://info.populix.co/reports/2023-06-the-future-of-work
Skerritt, L. (2019). Reconceptualizing hegemony in a global American century. Journal of Global Faultlines, 6(2), 150-165.
Suratnoaji, C., & Arianto, I. D. (2021). Metode Riset Sosial Berbasis Big Data. Penerbit Erlangga.
Suryadi, & Nasution, F. A. (2024). Digitalization, Current Working Conditions and Environment: Comparative Study of Several Countries in ASEAN. Jurnal Ketenagakerjaan, 19(1), 112-129. doi:https://doi.org/10.47198/jnaker.v19i1.334
Timming, A. R., Borg, J., French, M. T., & Mortensen, K. (2025). Do job seekers really understand what managers want in an employee? A between?subjects analysis of perceived graduate attributes. Tertiary Education and Management.
Tran, L. T., Ngo, N. T., Nguyen, H. T., & Le, T. T. (2024). “Employability in context”: graduate employability attributes expected by employers in regional Vietnam and implications for career guidance. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 24, 375-395.
Zeng, J., Ponce, A. R., & Li, Y. (2023). English linguistic neo-imperialism in the era of globalization: A conceptual viewpoint. Frontiers in Psychology. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1149471
Authors

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.